Loading [Contrib]/a11y/accessibility-menu.js
1.
Emary P, Ciraco C, DiDonato J, et al. TREATMENT PREFERENCES AMONG CANADIAN MILITARY VETERANS LIVING WITH CHRONIC LOW BACK PAIN: PROTOCOL FOR A MIXED METHODS CROSS-SECTIONAL SURVEY. JCC. 2023;6(1):129-148.
Download all (1)
  • Figure 1. Survey administration (CPCoE = Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence).

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Chronic low back pain is prevalent among military veterans. However, few veterans report being satisfied with their chronic pain care, and studies assessing veterans’ treatment preferences for managing chronic back pain are lacking. The purpose of our study is to examine Canadian military veterans’ use and preferences toward specific health care disciplines and treatment approaches for the management of chronic low back pain.

METHODS: We will administer a 33-item mixed-methods cross-sectional survey to all 1,681 Canadian Armed Forces veterans that have signed up to support chronic pain research with the Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans. Our survey will inquire about demographic variables, military and chronic low back pain-related characteristics, and veterans’ experiences and attitudes toward health care providers and therapeutic approaches for chronic low back pain. We will use descriptive statistics to analyze our quantitative survey data and thematic analysis for our qualitative (open-text) data. Both datasets will be integrated using a mixed methods approach. Our study will be reported in accordance with the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS) and the Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines.

DISCUSSION: The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board at McMaster University waived an ethics review of our survey based on its research development nature. Dissemination of our results will occur via a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. Our findings will inform the design of future studies to optimize low back pain services to veterans and military personnel.

INTRODUCTION

Chronic musculoskeletal pain is prevalent among military veterans and is associated with significant health care utilization and high treatment costs.1–4 A recent systematic review found that 31% (95% CI, 34-57%) of veterans live with chronic pain, which is 1.5 times higher than the rate of chronic pain in the general civilian population.5,6 Chronic low back pain, in particular, is a leading cause of disability within the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA), affecting 25% of veterans.7

Despite high rates of health care utilization, a 2021 survey of 701 Canadian veterans living with chronic pain (45% response rate) found that only 33% were somewhat (27%) or very satisfied (6%) with their care.8 Moreover, studies assessing veterans’ treatment preferences for managing chronic musculoskeletal pain are lacking.4 Evidence suggests there may be a disconnect between treatments for chronic low back pain preferred by veterans, and those preferred by health care providers. In a 2021 study involving veterans with chronic low back pain and primary care providers from 5 VA medical centers in the US,4 veterans ranked massage, physical therapy, and chiropractic care as their most preferred treatment options. In comparison, primary care providers ranked physical therapy, medications (i.e., analgesics, muscle relaxants, and adjuvants such as anti-depressants or anti-convulsant drugs), and psychological therapies (e.g., cognitive behavioral therapy, acceptance-commitment therapy, or mindfulness training) as their most preferred treatment approaches.4 This suggests an opportunity to better align treatment preferences of patients with management by health care providers, which has been shown to improve outcomes.9,10

In the aforementioned 2021 survey of Canadian veterans,8 optimization of chronic pain management after release from the military was identified as a top research priority. The Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans (CPCoE) was launched in April 2020 to support chronic pain research relevant to Canadian veterans.11 The mandate of the CPCoE is to build a knowledge transfer system with other institutions and community-based clinics, train and educate interdisciplinary healthcare teams, and develop evidence-based therapeutic strategies to improve pain management services for veterans living with chronic pain.

Aim

In collaboration with the CPCoE, the aim of our study is to examine Canadian military veterans’ use and preferences toward specific health care disciplines and treatment approaches for the management of chronic low back pain. Our findings will inform the design of future studies to optimize low back pain services to veterans and military personnel.

Hypothesis

We hypothesize that veterans living with chronic low back pain will report varying levels of use and preference toward health care disciplines and treatment approaches for managing chronic low back pain.

METHODS

Registration

Our study protocol was registered with the Open Science Framework (OSF) on January 12, 2023 and updated on February 6, 2023 (https://osf.io/pru92).

Study Design

We will use a convergent, mixed-methods study design,12 in which quantitative and qualitative (open-text) data are collected and analyzed concurrently. Both sets of data will be compared and combined (i.e., ‘triangulated’) to obtain a richer understanding of our cross-sectional survey findings.12

Data Collection Methods

We developed a 33-item English- and French-language questionnaire containing 24 multiple choice questions, 8 questions with response options on a Likert scale (i.e., 0 = “no pain/no disability”, 10 = “worst pain possible/complete disability”), and 3 open-ended questions (Appendix 1). The first part of the survey focuses on demographical and military-related variables, while the second asks about chronic low back pain characteristics, accessibility of low back pain services in the military, and personal experiences and attitudes toward health care disciplines and treatment approaches for the management of chronic low back pain. The survey was created by a team of epidemiologists, research methodologists and chronic pain experts, and was piloted by 2 veterans living with chronic low back pain for clarity and comprehensiveness, and to determine the time required for completion.13 We modified wording and structure of 2 questions (Question #'s 4 and 26) based on their feedback.

Sample Characteristics

Eligibility criteria

Eligible participants are Canadian military veterans living with chronic low back pain, defined as low back pain on most days or every day over the past 6 months.14 Two screening questions pertaining to military veteran status and chronic low back pain will be asked to confirm eligibility. Participants whose answers are contrary to any of the inclusion criteria aspects will be excluded and receive an exit prompt on the questionnaire.

Sample size and rationale

Our targeted sample size will be 300 veterans living with chronic low back pain. We believe that responses from 300 veterans will provide sufficient feedback to allow the 12 treatment approaches/health care disciplines presented in our survey to be ranked from most to least preferred. This number of responses should also allow us to adequately describe the demographic characteristics of our sample. Based on a previous survey with this study population,8 we expect a response proportion of approximately 23%. However, our sampling frame will include the entire population of CPCoE military veteran members (n = 1,681) to ensure that our sample size will be large enough to address our main objectives.

Survey Administration

An invitation to participate in the survey will be sent to all 1,681 Canadian Armed Forces veterans who have signed up to support chronic pain research with the CPCoE for Canadian Veterans.11 The invitation for participation letter will be sent via the veterans’ e-mail addresses and will explicitly detail the intent of the survey. Those that do not agree to participate will not be sent the survey but will still be included in the denominator for the calculation of the survey’s response rate. Those that agree to participate will be asked if they wish to complete the survey in English or French, and online or by hard-copy. Once a language choice is provided, participants will receive an e-mail containing a link to access the online questionnaire in their language of choice, built using LimeSurvey (LimeSurvey GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).

For participants that request a hard-copy of the survey, a paper-based version will be mailed to them along with a return envelope with pre-paid postage. If it is necessary to fax the survey, it will be faxed electronically to the participant using RingCentral (RingCentral Inc, Belmont, California, U.S.), and will come with a toll-free fax return number to return completed surveys. Both the faxed and electronic version of the survey will contain a disclosure letter that provides details on the intent of the study. Upon completion of the survey, participants can voluntarily declare whether or not they would like to receive the results of the study.

Two reminder e-mails will be sent to participants after periods of 4 and 8 weeks from the start date of survey distribution, after which the participants will no longer be contacted. Participants will have from mid-February 2023 to end of May 2023 to complete the survey. We will enable LimeSurvey’s online “cookie” feature to prevent repeated participation of respondents. A flow diagram of our survey administration is provided in Figure 1.

Figure 1
Figure 1.Survey administration (CPCoE = Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence).

Ethical Considerations

The Hamilton Integrated Research Ethics Board at McMaster University waived an ethics review for our survey based on its research development nature.15 All survey responses collected in this study will be reported as aggregate data without any participant identifiers.

Statistical Analysis

Measured variables

Participants will be asked to report a number of demographic characteristics, as well as military- and chronic low back pain-related variables (see Appendix 1, Question #‘s 1 to 25 and 27 to 32). We will also measure the mean ranking of veterans’ preference for each health care discipline for management of low back pain (Appendix 1, Question #26). In order to create this variable, each preference ranking for a given health care discipline will be assigned a number from 1 to 12 in descending order of preference. For example, a ranking of “1” corresponds to “most preferred” while a ranking of “12” corresponds to “least preferred.” Then, for each healthcare discipline the responses will be added up and divided by the total number of responses to retrieve a mean preference ranking. In addition, we will calculate the proportion of times that each health care discipline has been given a top-3 ranking (i.e., rank #1, 2 or 3), and the proportion of times that each healthcare discipline has been given a bottom-3 ranking (i.e., rank #10, 11 or 12). This will be determined by collapsing the above 12 preference rankings into 4 ordinal categories (1 = ranking #'s 1 to 3; 2 = ranking #'s 4 to 6; 3 = ranking #'s 7 to 9; 4 = ranking #'s 10 to 12), and then counting the number of times each health care discipline has been given the corresponding designation and dividing by the total number of responses per category. Participants will also be asked 2 open-ended questions about why they ranked their top and bottom 3 choices as their most and least preferred health care disciplines, respectively.

Primary analysis

All data will be populated into a de-identified Microsoft Excel database and organized for effective data analysis. Frequencies will be generated for all collected data. Categorical variables will be presented as frequency and percentage. Continuous variables will be presented as mean and standard deviation when normally distributed, and median and inter-quartile range when not. Listed health care disciplines (Appendix 1, Question #26) will be ranked in order of most to least preferred based on mean/median endorsement (Table 1). Categorical rankings of health care disciplines will also be displayed graphically with bar charts. All data analyses will be performed using SPSS V.28.0.1.0 (IBM SPSS Statistics).

Table 1.Canadian military veterans’ attitudes toward specific health care providers for the management of chronic low back pain
Health Care Discipline Mean (SD)/Median (IQR) Preference Ranking a Overall Top 3 Ranking
n (%)
Overall Bottom 3 Ranking
n (%)
1. Family doctor X X X
2. Physiatrist b X X X
3. Orthopedic surgeon X X X
4. Neurosurgeon X X X
5. Nurse X X X
6. Physiotherapist X X X
7. Chiropractor X X X
8. Occupational therapist X X X
9. Registered massage therapist X X X
10. Acupuncturist/TCM practitioner X X X
11. Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist) X X X

IQR = inter-quartile range, SD = standard deviation, TCM = Traditional Chinese Medicine.
a The central tendency and measure of spread (i.e., SD or IQR) will depend on the data distribution.
b A physiatrist is a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation.

Thematic analysis

A thematic analysis12 will be conducted on the open-ended response questions (Appendix 1, Question #'s 26 and 33). Two independent reviewers will evaluate written responses and a coding strategy will be developed through discussion. We expect that after several rounds of coding written comments, clusters of sub-themes under themes will emerge. We will only code sub-themes that appear in at least 2 surveys. Any disagreements will be resolved through discussion to establish consensus. Illustrative quotes will be selected from the open-ended responses, guided by a consensus on informativeness and representativeness among the reviewers (Table 2).

Table 2.Summary of thematic analysis findings from open-ended survey responses
Theme a Sub-Themes a No. of Endorsements Exemplary Quotation
Question #26: Top 3 choices for most preferred health care discipline (n = …)
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Question #26: Bottom 3 choices for most preferred health care discipline (n = …)
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Question #33: Final survey comments (n = …)
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X

a The number of themes and sub-themes displayed in Table 2 are for illustrative purposes and will be determined following data analysis.

Mixed methods analysis

Our quantitative and qualitative results will be integrated using joint display (Table 3), contiguous narrative, and weaving approaches.16 We will use the qualitative findings to illuminate the statistical findings from the survey, and draw upon both sets of data to come to a set of conclusions (i.e., ‘meta-inferences’).12

Table 3.Joint display of quantitative and qualitative survey results
Variable Quantitative Results Representative Quotations Meta-Inferences
1. X (n = …) X X X
2. X (n = …) X X X
3. X (n = …) X X X
Etc. X X X

Missing data

Questionnaires with > 50% missing data (i.e., $\geq \ $17 items) will be omitted from all analyses.8

Reporting

We have reported our study protocol, and will report our final results, in accordance with the Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS)17 and the Good Reporting of A Mixed Methods Study (GRAMMS) guidelines.18

DISCUSSION

This will be the first study to conduct a mixed-methods, needs assessment survey on Canadian veterans’ experiences and attitudes toward health care providers and treatment approaches for the management of chronic low back pain. Our findings will inform the design of future studies to optimize low back pain services to veterans and military personnel. Of particular relevance to the chiropractic profession, we will also seek to determine whether our sample of Canadian veterans had previous access to chiropractic care while in the military; whether they used such services and, if so, what their experiences were; and whether they feel chiropractic care should be available at military bases for actively serving members of the Canadian Armed Forces.

Chiropractic services were first included in the US military health care system in 1995, beginning as a 5-year feasibility and health services evaluation project at 13 military bases.19 In 2000, the development of permanent chiropractic services and benefits for uniformed service members was approved by US Congress, and chiropractic services are now provided at more than 60 US military facilities across the country.19 There is evidence from several studies to support the inclusion of chiropractic care in the US military health care system.20–22 In 2 recent randomized controlled trials involving active-duty military personnel,21,22 those receiving chiropractic care and usual medical care showed statistically significant greater improvements in low back pain intensity,21,22 function,21,22 strength,22 endurance,22 satisfaction,21,22 and analgesic use21 compared to those allocated to usual medical care alone. There is preliminary evidence supporting inclusion of chiropractic services in the Canadian Forces Health Services delivery system.23,24 At present, however, chiropractors cannot become commissioned officers in Canada, there are no chiropractic services available on any military base in Canada, and the Canadian Armed Forces currently reimburse approximately $1 million CAD/year for service members, who have received authorization from an on-base physician, to travel off-base to receive chiropractic care (personal communication, Dr. Markus Besemann, Head of Rehabilitation Medicine, Canadian Forces Health Services).25

Strengths and Limitations

Strengths of our study include pre-testing of our survey questionnaire, providing our survey in Canada’s two official languages (English and French), use of both closed- and open-ended response options, integrating our quantitative and qualitative datasets in a mixed methods design, and reminders to potential participants to increase our survey response rate. Our study will also have limitations. First, our sample will not include former members of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police, who are also veterans. Second, our survey participants will be veterans that have expressed an interest in research and a willingness to be included in a mailing list maintained by the CPCoE for Canadian Veterans which may introduce selection bias. Third, we do not query survey participants about whether they are seeking, or have been granted, disability benefits for low back pain, which could influence responses. Last, there may be a lower participant response to the qualitative (open-text) questions in our survey because participants will already be asked to answer several items in the quantitative portion of the questionnaire.

Knowledge Translation

The results of our survey will be disseminated via a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations, and provided on the CPCoE website.


Role of the Funding Source

The Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Drs. Christine Goertz, Robert Kerns, Anthony Lisi, Markus Besemann and Graeme McBride, as well as the CPCoE for their feedback and assistance in designing the survey instrument for this study.

Disclaimer

This study was funded by the Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans. Dr. Emary is a postdoctoral fellow in the Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre at McMaster University and is supported by research grants from the NCMIC Foundation and the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation outside of the submitted work. Dr. Busse is supported, in part, by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Canada Research Chair in the prevention and management of chronic pain. All authors have no competing interests to declare.

References

1.
Clark JD. Chronic pain prevalence and analgesic prescribing in a general medical population. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2002;23(2):131-137. doi:10.1016/​s0885-3924(01)00396-7
Google Scholar
2.
Yu W, Ravelo A, Wagner TH, et al. Prevalence and costs of chronic conditions in the VA health care system. Med Care Res Rev. 2003;60(3_suppl):146S-167S. doi:10.1177/​1077558703257000
Google Scholar
3.
Kerns RD, Otis J, Rosenberg R, Reid MC. Veterans reports of pain and associations with ratings of health, health-risk behaviors, affective distress, and use of the healthcare system. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(5):371. doi:10.1682/​jrrd.2003.09.0371
Google Scholar
4.
Belitskaya-Levy I, Clark D, Shih MC, Bair MJ. Treatment preferences for chronic low back pain: views of veterans and their providers. JPR. 2021;14:161-171. doi:10.2147/​jpr.s290400
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
5.
Qureshi AR, Patel M, Neumark S, et al. Prevalence of chronic noncancer pain among military veterans: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Mil Med, submitted for publication.
Google Scholar
6.
Reyes Velez J, Thompson JM, Sweet J, Busse JW, VanTil L. Cluster analysis of Canadian Armed Forces veterans living with chronic pain: life after service studies 2016. Can J Pain. 2021;5(1):81-95. doi:10.1080/​24740527.2021.1898278
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
7.
Goulet JL, Kerns RD, Bair M, et al. The musculoskeletal diagnosis cohort: examining pain and pain care among veterans. Pain. 2016;157(8):1696-1703. doi:10.1097/​j.pain.0000000000000567
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
8.
Qureshi AR, Makanjuola O, Neumark S, Garas A, Wang L, Busse JW. Research priorities among Canadian military veterans living with chronic pain: a cross-sectional survey. Mil Med. 2022;188(7-8):e2373-e2379. doi:10.1093/​milmed/​usac309
Google Scholar
9.
Sullivan MD, Leigh J, Gaster B. Brief report: training internists in shared decision making about chronic opioid treatment for noncancer pain. J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21(4):360-362. doi:10.1111/​j.1525-1497.2006.00352.x
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
10.
Bieber C, Müller KG, Blumenstiel K, et al. Long-term effects of a shared decision-making intervention on physician-patient interaction and outcome in fibromyalgia. A qualitative and quantitative 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(3):357-366. doi:10.1016/​j.pec.2006.05.003
Google Scholar
11.
Veterans Affairs Canada: Launch of the Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence for Canadian Veterans. Accessed April 18, 2023. https:/​/​www.canada.ca/​en/​veterans-affairs-canada/​news/​2020/​05/​launch-of-the-chronic-pain-centre-of-excellence-for-canadian-veterans.html;
12.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. 3rd ed. Sage; 2018.
Google Scholar
13.
Boynton PM. Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire. Br Med J. 2004;328(7452):1372-1375. doi:10.1136/​bmj.328.7452.1372
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
14.
Dahlhamer J, Lucas J, Zelaya, C, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain and high-impact chronic pain among adults – United States, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2018;67(36):1001-1006. doi:10.15585/​mmwr.mm6736a2
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
15.
Health Research Authority INVOLVE: Public involvement in research and research ethics committee review. Accessed April 17, 2023. https:/​/​www.invo.org.uk/​wp-content/​uploads/​2016/​05/​HRA-INVOLVE-updated-statement-2016.pdf;
16.
Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs – principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6pt2):2134-2156. doi:10.1111/​1475-6773.12117
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
17.
Sharma A, Minh Duc NT, Luu Lam Thang T, et al. A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS). J Gen Intern Med. 2021;36(10):3179-3187. doi:10.1007/​s11606-021-06737-1
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
18.
O’Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. The quality of mixed methods studies in health services research. J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(2):92-98. doi:10.1258/​jhsrp.2007.007074
Google Scholar
19.
Green BN, Gilford SR, Beacham RF. Chiropractic in the United States military health system: a 25th-anniversary celebration of the early years. J Chiropr Humanit. 2020;27:37-58. doi:10.1016/​j.echu.2020.10.006
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
20.
Green BN, Johnson CD, Daniels CJ, Napuli JG, Gliedt JA, Paris DJ. Integration of chiropractic services in military and veteran health care facilities: a systematic review of the literature. J Evid Based Complementary Altern Med. 2016;21(2):115-130. doi:10.1177/​2156587215621461
Google Scholar
21.
Goertz CM, Long CR, Vining RD, Pohlman KA, Walter J, Coulter I. Effect of usual medical care plus chiropractic care vs usual medical care alone on pain and disability among US service members with low back pain: a comparative effectiveness clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2018;1(1):e180105. doi:10.1001/​jamanetworkopen.2018.0105
Google ScholarPubMed CentralPubMed
22.
Vining R, Long CR, Minkalis A, et al. Effects of chiropractic care on strength, balance, and endurance in active-duty U.S. military personnel with low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complement Med. 2020;26(7):592-601. doi:10.1089/​acm.2020.0107
Google Scholar
23.
Boudreau LA, Busse JW, McBride G. Chiropractic services in the Canadian Armed Forces: a pilot project. Mil Med. 2006;171(6):572-576. doi:10.7205/​milmed.171.6.572
Google Scholar
24.
Vogel E, Mior SA, Sutton D, et al. When boundaries blur - exploring healthcare providers’ views of chiropractic interprofessional care and the Canadian Forces Health Services. J Can Chiropr Assoc. 2021;65(1):14-31.
Google Scholar
25.
Olin G. Canadian Armed Forces members deserve easier access to health care. The Hill Times. Published online November 20, 2019. Accessed April 22, 2023. https:/​/​www.hilltimes.com/​story/​2019/​11/​20/​canadian-armed-forces-members-deserve-easier-access-to-health-care/​266455/​;
Google Scholar

Appendix 1. Copy of the English version of the survey instrument.

Treatment Preferences of Canadian Military Veterans living with Chronic Low Back Pain

[Insert date]

Dear [First Name],

The Chronic Pain Centre of Excellence (CPCoE) for Canadian Veterans is working with Dr. Peter Emary, a postdoctoral research fellow under the supervision of Dr. Jason Busse, Director of Research for the CPCoE. In collaboration with the CPCoE, a study is being conducted on Canadian Veterans’ use and preferences toward health care providers and treatment approaches for the management of chronic low back pain.

This study will be used to make recommendations to health care providers and to help researchers design studies on providing better low back pain services to military personnel.

Following this cover page is a 33-question survey which should take between 15 to 20 minutes to complete. These questions are based on previous research of Veterans living with chronic low back pain, as well as feedback from Canadian Veterans and chronic pain experts. Prior to the actual survey, there are two questions to assess your eligibility for completing the survey.

If you have any questions or concerns at any point regarding the survey, please contact Peter Emary through e-mail at emaryp@mcmaster.ca.

Thank you very much for your time and assistance.

Sincerely,

Peter Emary, DC, PhD

Postdoctoral Fellow, Michael G. DeGroote National Pain Centre

McMaster University

Screening Questions

We would like to first ask you two questions to determine your eligibility for completing the survey.

I. Have you previously served in the Canadian Armed Forces?

     Yes

     No

II. Do you currently live with chronic low back pain?

Chronic low back pain is defined as low back pain on most days or every day over the past 6 months.

     Yes

     No

Demographic Questions

1. What is your gender?

     □ Female

     □ Male

     □ Other: _____________________________

     □Prefer not to answer

2. What is your age?

     □18 to 24

     □25 to 34

     □35 to 44

     □45 to 54

     □55 to 64

     □65+

3. What branch(s) of the military did you serve in (check all that apply)?

     □Royal Canadian Navy

     □Canadian Army

     □Royal Canadian Air Force

     □Canadian Special Operations Forces Command

     □Other: _____________________________

4. What was your final rank in the military?

     □Officer

     □ Warrant Officers Petty Officer and Senior Non-Commissioned Officer

     □Junior Non-Commissioned Member

     □Other: _____________________________

5. What component(s) of the military were you a part of?

     □Regular Force

     □Primary Reserve

     □Primary Reserve – Cadet Organizations Administration and Training Service

     □Primary Reserve – Canadian Rangers

     □Other: _____________________________

6. Which of the following best describes the primary focus of your occupational specialty (*) in the military?

     □ Operational or Combat-related

     □ Operational support (i.e., Non-operational or non-combat related positions that assisted operational or combat-related forces to deliver their mission)

     □ Institutional support (i.e., Non-operational or non-combat related positions that were not involved in assisting operational or combat-related forces directly; e.g., base/wing positions, support for educational institutions)

     □ Other: _____________________________

     * What was your specific trade? (e.g., infanteer, IT technician, medical assistant, combat engineer, etc.)

     ___________________________________

7. How many years did you serve in the military?

     □ Less than 5 years

     □ 5 to 10 years

     □ 11 to 15 years

     □ 16 to 20 years

     □ 21 to 25 years

     □ 26 to 30 years

     □ More than 30 years

8. How many years has it been since you released from the military?

     □ Less than 5 years

     □ 5 to 10 years

     □ 11 to 15 years

     □ 16 to 20 years

     □ More than 20 years

9. What was your province or territory of residence at the time of release from the military?

     □ Ontario

     □ Manitoba

     □ Quebec

     □ Nova Scotia

     □ New Brunswick

     □ Prince Edward Island

     □ Newfoundland and Labrador

     □ Saskatchewan

     □ Alberta

     □ British Columbia

     □ Yukon

     □ Northwest Territories

     □ Nunavut

     □ Other: _____________________________

10. What is your current province or territory of residence?

     □ Ontario

     □ Manitoba

     □ Quebec

     □ Nova Scotia

     □ New Brunswick

     □ Prince Edward Island

     □ Newfoundland and Labrador

     □ Saskatchewan

     □ Alberta

     □ British Columbia

     □ Yukon

     □ Northwest Territories

     □ Nunavut

     □ Other: _____________________________

11. What best describes your current region of residence?

     □ Urban (in the city)

     □ Rural (in the country)

     □ Suburban (mixed-use or residential area, existing either as part of a city area or as a separate residential community within commuting distance of a city)

     □ Other: _____________________________

12. What best describes your current gross income level?

     □ Below $25,000

     □ $25,000 to $49,000

     □ $50,000 to $59,000

     □ $60,000 to $79,000

     □ $80,000 to $99,000

     □ $100,000 to $150,000

     □ More than $150,000

     □ Prefer not to answer

13. Which of the following best describes your race or ethnicity?

     □ Asian – East (e.g., Chinese, Japanese, Korean)

     □ Asian – South (e.g., Indian, Pakistani, Sri Lankan, Indo-Caribbean/West Indian)

     □ Asian – Southeast (e.g., Malaysian, Filipino, Vietnamese, Cambodian)

     □ Asian – West (e.g., Afghan, Israeli, Saudi Arabian, Iranian, Turkish)

     □ Australasian – (e.g., Australia, New Zealand, New Guinea, Melanesia)

     □ Black – Africa (e.g., Ghanaian, Kenyan, Somali)

     □ Black – North America

     □ Black – Caribbean Region (e.g., Barbadian, Jamaican)

     □ Hispanic

     □ Indigenous (e.g., Inuit, First Nations, Non-Status Indian, Metis, Indigenous person from outside Canada)

     □ Latin American (e.g., Argentinean, Chilean, Salvadoran)

     □ White/European (e.g., English, Italian, Portuguese, Russian)

     □ Prefer not to answer

     □ Do not know

     □ Other: _____________________________

14. What is your highest formal education level?

     □ High School

     □ College Degree

     □ University Degree

     □ Other: _____________________________

15. What best describes your current relationship status?

     □ Single/Never Married

     □ Married

     □ Common law

     □ Separated

     □ Divorced

     □ Widowed

     □ Chronic Low Back Pain Section

The following questions seek to understand when your chronic low back pain originated, how much it impacts your day-to-day life, what treatments you have received and are currently using for your chronic low back pain, which health care providers you prefer to see for treatment of your chronic low back pain, what treatments were available to you while serving in the military, and if you feel other treatments may have been helpful.

There are no right or wrong answers. Please answer based on your own experiences and opinions.

A. Impact of chronic low back pain

16. How many years have you lived with chronic low back pain?

     □ 6 months to 1 year

     □ 1+ to 5 years

     □ 5+ to 10 years

     □ 10+ to 20 years

     □ 20+ years

17. Over the past week, on average, how would you rate your chronic low back pain?

No pain Worst pain possible

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

18. Over the past week, how much has your chronic low back pain interfered with your daily activities (housework, washing, dressing, walking, climbing stairs, getting in/out of bed/chair)?

No interference Unable to carry out activity

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

19. Over the past week, how much has your chronic low back pain interfered with your ability to take part in recreational, social, and family activities?

No interference Unable to carry out activity

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

20. Over the past week, how anxious (tense, uptight, irritable, difficulty in concentrating/relaxing) have you been feeling?

Not at all anxious Extremely anxious

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

21. Over the past week, how depressed (down-in-the-dumps, sad, in low spirits, pessimistic, unhappy) have you been feeling?

Not at all depressed Extremely depressed

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

22. Over the past week, how have you felt your work (both inside and outside the home) has affected (or would affect) your chronic low back pain?

Have made it no worse Have made it much worse

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

23. Over the past week, how much have you been able to control (reduce/help) your chronic low back pain on your own?

Completely control it No control whatsoever

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

B. Treatments and health care providers used (or currently using) for chronic low back pain

24. Which of the following treatments have you received, at any time, for your chronic low back pain? (choose all that apply):

Over-the-counter medications:

► Examples: Tylenol, Advil □ tried in the past □ currently using

Opioid medications:

► Examples: Codeine, morphine, hydromorphone, tramadol □ tried in the past □ currently using

Adjuvant medications:

► Examples: Anti-depressants (e.g., duloxetine, amitriptyline), anti-

seizure drugs (e.g., lamotrigine, gabapentin, carbamazepine) □ tried in the past □ currently using

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs):

► Examples: Naproxen, celecoxib □ tried in the past □ currently using

Topical agents:

► Examples: Capsaicin, lidocaine □ tried in the past □ currently using

Muscle relaxants:

► Examples: Baclofen, tizanidine □ tried in the past □ currently using

Cannabis:

► Examples: Inhaled, oral □ tried in the past □ currently using

Injections or other interventional procedures:

► Examples: Nerve blocks, epidural or corticosteroid injections, muscle/trigger point injections (e.g., lidocaine, botox), ultrasound infusion/administration of medications (e.g., lidocaine, ketamine), nerve denervation (e.g., radiofrequency ablation) □ tried in the past □ currently using

Low back surgery:

► Examples: Spinal laminectomy, discectomy, foraminotomy,

nucleoplasty, spinal fusion, artificial disc replacement □ tried in the past □ currently using

Physiotherapy:

► Examples: Exercise therapy, stretching/mobilization, traction, TENS

(Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation), low-level laser therapy, therapeutic ultrasound □ tried in the past □ currently using

Chiropractic care:

► Examples: Spinal manipulation/ “adjustment”, flexion-distraction therapy (i.e., spinal decompression/manual traction), soft-tissue massage/stretching, advice on exercise/ergonomics □ tried in the past □ currently using

Psychotherapy:

► Examples: Pain neuroscience education program/chronic pain management course, family or group therapy, cognitive-behavioural therapy (individual or group), acceptance and commitment therapy, mind-body therapy (e.g., mindfulness/meditation), biofeedback □ tried in the past □ currently using

Complementary and alternative medicine (choose all that apply):

     Naturopathic treatment/homeopathic remedies: □ tried in the past □ currently using

     Acupuncture: □ tried in the past □ currently using

     Registered massage therapy: □ tried in the past □ currently using

     Osteopathy: □ tried in the past □ currently using

     Other: _____________________________ □ tried in the past □ currently using

Other treatment(s) not covered above: _____________________________ □ tried in the past □ currently using

     □ Not applicable (I have never received treatment for my chronic low back pain)

25. Which health care providers have you seen for your chronic low back pain, at any time? (check all that apply):

□ Family doctor

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Physiatrist (a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation)

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Orthopedic surgeon

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Neurosurgeon

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Nurse

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Physiotherapist

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Chiropractor

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Occupational therapist

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Registered massage therapist

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Acupuncturist/Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioner

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist)

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Others (please list): _____________________________

On a scale of 0-10, how satisfied were you with the care provided? ___ (0 = not at all satisfied, 10 = completely satisfied)

□ Not applicable (I have never seen a health care provider for my chronic low back pain)

C. Attitudes toward specific health care providers for chronic low back pain

26. Which health care providers do you most prefer to see for treatment of your chronic low back pain? (1 = most preferred, 12 = least preferred):

(1) Family doctor □ (1-12)

(2) Physiatrist (a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation) □ (1-12)

(3) Orthopedic surgeon □ (1-12)

(4) Neurosurgeon □ (1-12)

(5) Nurse □ (1-12)

(6) Physiotherapist □ (1-12)

(7) Chiropractor □ (1-12)

(8) Occupational therapist □ (1-12)

(9) Registered massage therapist □ (1-12)

(10) Acupuncturist/Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioner □ (1-12)

(11) Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist) □ (1-12)

(12) Others (please list): _____________________________ □ (1-12)

□ Not applicable

► For your top 3 choices above (i.e., those you rated as being #1, 2 and 3), can you explain why you most prefer to see these health care providers for treatment of your chronic low back pain?

► For your bottom 3 choices above (i.e., those you rated as being #10, 11 and 12), can you explain why you least prefer to see these health care providers for treatment of your chronic low back pain?

D. Accessibility of low back pain services in the military

27. When during your military career did you begin experiencing low back pain?

     □ Before military service

     □ During military service

     □ After military service

28. During your military service, which health care providers did you see on base for low back pain treatment? (check all that apply):

     □ Not applicable (I did not experience low back pain while in the military)

     □ Family doctor

     □ Physiatrist (a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation)

     □ Orthopedic surgeon

     □ Neurosurgeon

     □ Nurse

     □ Physiotherapist

     □ Chiropractor

     □ Occupational therapist

     □ Registered massage therapist

     □ Acupuncturist/Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioner

     □ Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist)

     □ Others (please list): _____________________________

29. During your military service, which health care providers did you see off-base for low back pain treatment? (check all that apply):

     □ Not applicable (I did not experience low back pain while in the military)

     □ Family doctor

     □ Physiatrist (a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation)

     □ Orthopedic surgeon

     □ Neurosurgeon

     □ Nurse

     □ Physiotherapist

     □ Chiropractor

     □ Occupational therapist

     □ Registered massage therapist

     □ Acupuncturist/Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioner

     □ Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist)

     □ Others (please list): _____________________________

30. Which health care providers do you believe should be available on base for low back pain treatment? (check all that apply):

     □ Family doctor

     □ Physiatrist (a physician specializing in physical medicine and rehabilitation)

     □ Orthopedic surgeon

     □ Neurosurgeon

     □ Nurse

     □ Physiotherapist

     □ Chiropractor

     □ Occupational therapist

     □ Registered massage therapist

     □ Acupuncturist/Traditional Chinese Medicine practitioner

     □ Mental health professional (e.g., psychologist)

     □ Others (please list): _____________________________

31. Do you feel that your low back pain, when it first started, was treated effectively?

     □ Yes □ No □ Unsure

32. Do you feel that more treatment options or better access to care when your low back pain first started may have prevented it from becoming chronic?

     □ Yes □ No □ Unsure

E. Final comments

33. Are there any other comments you would like to share regarding your experiences with managing your chronic low back pain?

_____________________________

End of Survey

Thank you for your time!

If you have any further questions, please contact Dr. Peter Emary at: emaryp@mcmaster.ca