Main Article Content

Paul Wanlass
Sarah Dirks


Medical Education, Training, Chiropractic Technique


Objective: To evaluate faculty perceptions of the benefits of chiropractic technique elective courses toward students’ future practice.

Methods: We surveyed faculty members at a chiropractic college who teach chiropractic technique curriculum (preclinical technique courses, clinical clerkship program, and technique elective courses). Questions included faculty training in chiropractic technique, their role in the technique curriculum, and their perception of the value of the technique elective courses. The survey instrument was pretested for face validity prior to administration. All data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Of the 32 faculty members who received the survey, 27 (84%) responded. A majority of the respondents indicated having been trained in diversified (81%) and Cox (52%) techniques. Most agreed that diversified (93%), Cox (89%), Thompson (74%), Sacro-Occipital Technique (SOT) (54%), and Activator (52%) elective courses would be valuable for students’ future practice. Ninety-six percent of the survey participants valued the role of preclinical technique courses, and the clinical clerkship experience in preparing students for future practice, compared to 81% of the respondents valuing the role of the elective technique courses.

Conclusion: Preclinical, clinical, and elective faculty perceived that elective chiropractic technique courses were valuable in students' technique education in preparing them for future practice. Future studies should be done among multiple chiropractic institutions to have better understanding of faculty perceptions about students’ technique education in preparing them for successful practice. These future faculty studies should be compared to similar studies from the student, graduate, and administrative perspectives.


Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 468 | TECHNIQUE ELECTIVE COURSES Downloads 228


1. Wanlass P, Sikorski D, Kizhakkeveettil A, Tobias G. The association between students taking elective courses In chiropractic technique and their anticipated chiropractic technique choices in ruture practice. J Chiropr Educ 2018;32(2):126-130

2. Alsubaie MA. Curriculum development: teacher involvement in curriculum development. J Educ Pract, 2016:7:106-107

3. Christensen M, Kollasch M, Ward R, Webb K. Job analysis of chiropractic, 2005. Greeley, CO: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2005:135,163.

4. Leone A. Relationship between techniques taught and practice behavior: education and clinical correlation. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999;22:29-31

5. Mykietiuk C, Wambolt M, Pillipow T, Mallay C, Gleberzon BJ. Technique systems used by post-1980 graduates of the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College practicing In five Canadian provinces: a preliminary survey. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2009;53(1):32-39

6. Vermet S, McGinnis K, Boodham M, Gleberzon B. Degree Of vertical integration between the undergraduate program and clinical clerkship with respect to lumbopelvic diagnostic and therapeutic procedures taught at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College. J Chiropr Educ 2010;24:46-56

7. Gleberzon B, Stuber K. Frequency of use of diagnostic and manual therapeutic procedures of the spine taught at the Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College: a preliminary survey of Ontario chiropractors. Part 1 – practice characteristics and demographic profiles. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2013;57(1):32-41

8. Sikorski D, Kizhakkeveettil A, Tobias G. The influence of curricular and extracurricular learning activities on students’ choice of chiropractic technique. J Chiropr Educ 2016;30(1):30–36