NECESSITY FOR BIOMECHANICAL EVALUATION OF POSTURE, ALIGNMENT AND SUBLUXATION. PART I. THE 6 SUBLUXATION TYPES THAT SATISFY NELSON’S CRITERION FOR VALID SUBLUXATION THEORY

Main Article Content

Deed E. Harrison
Paul A. Oakley

Keywords

Spine; Posture; Subluxation

Abstract

Radiology has been a cornerstone for the analysis of spinal alignment for over a century. Although there has been a movement within chiropractic to reduce the use of x-ray, this runs counter to both traditional and current biomechanical evidence-based subluxation models. We present evidence supporting the scientific basis of 6 contemporary subluxation types that currently underpin the basis for routine radiographic examination for biomechanical data related to the diagnosis and treatment of patients in modern chiropractic practice. We also discuss how these 6 types of subluxation satisfy Nelson’s criterion and achieve valid subluxation theory status.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 5218 | General-18-7087 JCC Article_Necessity.pdf Downloads 149

References

1. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Kent C, Betz J. Practicing chiropractors’ guidelines for the utilization of plain film x-ray imaging for the biomechanical assessment, characterization, and quantification of spinal subluxation in chiropractic clinical practice. Practicing Chiropractors' Committee on Radiology Protocols (PCCRP) (www.pccrp.org), 2009:1-386
2. Hildebrandt RW. Chiropractic spinography and postural roentgenology. Part I: history of development. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1980;3:87-92
3. Bussières AE, Sales AE, Ramsay T, Hilles S, Grimshaw JM. Practice patterns in spine radiograph utilization among doctors of chiropractic enrolled in a provider network offering complementary care in the United States. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2013;36(3):127-42
4. Bussières AE, Laurencelle L, Peterson, C. Diagnostic imaging guidelines implementation study for spinal disorders. a randomized trial with postal follow-ups. J Chiropr Educ 2010;24(1):2–18
5. Bussières AE, Taylor JA, Peterson C. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults-an evidence-based approach-part 3: spinal disorders. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2008;31(1):33-88
6. Bussières AE, Peterson C, Taylor JA. Diagnostic imaging practice guidelines for musculoskeletal complaints in adults--an evidence-based approach: introduction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30(9):617-683
7. ACA: Five things physicians and patients should question. (http://www.acatoday.org/News-Publications-Newsroom-News-Releases-ACA-Releases-Choosing-Wisely-List)
8. Sacks B, Meyerson G, Siegel JA. Epidemiology without biology: false paradigms, unfounded assumptions, and specious statistics in radiation science. Biol Theory 2016;11:69-101
9. Siegel JA, McCollough CH, Orton CG. Advocating for use of the ALARA principle in the context of medical imaging fails to recognize that the risk is hypothetical and so serves to reinforce patients' fears of radiation. Med Phys. 2017;44(1):3-6
10. Marchiori DM, Hawk C, Howe J. Chiropractic radiologists: a survey of demographics, abilities, educational attitudes and practice trends. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998 ;21(6):392-398
11. Adams J, Lauche R, Peng W, Steel A, Moore C, Amorin-Woods LG, Sibbritt D. A workforce survey of Australian chiropractic: the profile and practice features of a nationally representative sample of 2,005 chiropractors. BMC Complement Altern Med 2017;17(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12906-016-1542-x
12. Puhl AA, Reinhart CJ, Injeyan HS. Diagnostic and treatment methods used by chiropractors: A random sample survey of Canada's English-speaking provinces. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2015;59(3):279-287
13. Beck RW, Holt KR, Fox MA, Hurtgen-Grace KL. Radiographic anomalies that may alter chiropractic intervention strategies found in a New Zealand population. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004;27(9):554-559
14. Palmer DD. The Science, Art, and Philosophy of Chiropractic. Portland, Oregon, Printing House Company, 1910
15. Plaugher G. Textbook of clinical chiropractic: a specific biomechanical approach. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1993
16. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Harrison GR, Troyanovich S, Harrison DE, Harrison SO. Chiropractic biophysics technique: a linear algebra approach to posture in chiropractic. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1996;19(8):525-535
17. Plaugher G, Cremata EE, Phillips RB. A retrospective consecutive case analysis of pretreatment and comparative static radiological parameters following chiropractic adjustments. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990;13:498-506
18. Harrison DD, Jackson BL, Troyanovich S, Robertson G, de George D, Barker WF. The efficacy of cervical extension-compression traction combined with diversified manipulation and drop table adjustments in the rehabilitation of cervical lordosis: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1994;17(7):454-64
19. Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, et al. Manipulation and mobilization of the cervical spine: a systematic review of the literature. Spine 1996;21:1746-1759
20. Shilton M, Branney J, de Vries BP, et al. Does cervical lordosis change after spinal manipulation for non-specific neck pain? A prospective cohort study. Chiropr Man Therap 2015;23:33
21. Haldeman S. Principles and practice of chiropractic. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1979
22. Gatterman MI. Foundations of chiropractic. Subluxation. St. Louis, Missouri: Mosby-Year Book, Inc. 1995,Table 1-1
23. Harrison DD. Rotation and translations of the spine and pelvis. Chiropractic Biophysics newsletter. February, 1987:1
24. Harrison DD. Chiropractic: The physics of spinal correction. CBP Seminars. 1988
25. Harrison DD: Abnormal postural permutations calculated as rotations and translations from an ideal normal upright static posture. In Sweere, JJ: Chiropractic Family Practice. Aspen Publishers, Gaithersburg, MD; 1992, chap 6-1:1-22
26. Panjabi MM, White AA 3rd, Brand RA Jr. A note on defining body parts configurations. J Biomech 1974;7(4):385-387
27. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM. Clinical biomechanics of the spine. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. 1990
28. Roussouly P, Pinheiro-Franco JL. Biomechanical analysis of the spino-pelvic organization and adaptation in pathology. Eur Spine J 2011;20 Suppl 5:609-618
29. Panjabi MM, Oda T, Crisco JJ 3rd, Dvorak J, Grob D. Posture affects motion coupling patterns of the upper cervical spine. J Orthop Res 1993;11(4):525-536
30. Panjabi M, Yamamoto I, Oxland T, Crisco J. How does posture affect coupling in the lumbar spine? Spine 1989;14(9):1002-1011
31. Kuntz C 4th, Levin LS, Ondra SL, Shaffrey CI, Morgan CJ. Neutral upright sagittal spinal alignment from the occiput to the pelvis in asymptomatic adults: a review and resynthesis of the literature. J Neurosurg Spine 2007;6(2):104-112
32. Le Huec JC, Saddiki R, Franke J, Rigal J, Aunoble S. Equilibrium of the human body and the gravity line: the basics. Eur Spine J 2011;20 Suppl 5:558-563
33. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Perrin G, Le Huec JC. Sagittal balance disorders in severe degenerative spine. Can we identify the compensatory mechanisms? Eur Spine J 2011;20 Suppl 5:626-633
34. Pal GP, Sherk HH. The vertical stability of the cervical spine. Spine 1988;13(5):447-449
35. McGill SM. Low back disorders. Evidence-based prevention and rehabilitation. Windsor, ON: Human Kinetics, 2002
36. Kaneoka K, Ono K, Inami S, Hayashi K. Motion analysis of cervical vertebrae during whiplash loading. Spine 1999;24(8):763-769
37. Grauer JN, Panjabi MM, Cholewicki J, Nibu K, Dvorak J. Whiplash produces an S-shaped curvature of the neck with hyperextension at lower levels. Spine 1997;22(21):2489-2494
38. Nightingale RW, Sganga J, Cutcliffe H, Bass CR. Impact responses of the cervical spine: A computational study of the effects of muscle activity, torso constraint, and pre-flexion. J Biomech 2016;49(4):558-564
39. Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Effects of abnormal posture on capsular ligament elongations in a computational model subjected to whiplash loading. J Biomech 2005;38(6):1313-1323
40. Maiman DJ, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Preinjury cervical alignment affecting spinal trauma. J Neurosurg 2002;97(1 Suppl):57-62
41. Murray KJ, Le Grande MR, Ortega de Mues A, Azari MF. Characterisation of the correlation between standing lordosis and degenerative joint disease in the lower lumbar spine in women and men: a radiographic study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2017;18(1):330
42. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Jones EW, Cailliet R, Normand M. Comparison of Axial and Flexural Stresses in Lordosis and Three Buckled Modes in the Cervical Spine. Clin Biomech 2001;16(4):276-284
43. Harrison DD, Jones EW, Janik TJ, Harrison DE. Evaluation of flexural stresses in the vertebral body cortex and trabecular bone in three cervical configurations with an elliptical shell model. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25(6):391-401
44. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Holland B. Comparisons of lordotic cervical spine curvatures to a theoretical ideal model of the static sagittal cervical spine. Spine 1996;21(6):667-675
45. Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Colloca CJ. Evaluations of the assumptions used to derive an ideal normal cervical spine model. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1997;20(4):246-256
46. Harrison DD, Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Cailliet R, Haas JW, Ferrantelli J, Holland B. Modeling of the sagittal cervical spine as a method to discriminate hypo-lordosis: results of elliptical and circular modeling in 72 asymptomatic subjects, 52 acute neck pain subjects, and 70 chronic neck pain subjects. Spine 2004;29:2485-2492
47. Harrison DE, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Harmon S. Can the thoracic kyphosis be modeled with a simple geometric shape? the results of circular and elliptical modeling in 80 asymptomatic subjects. J Spinal Disord 2002;15(3):213-220
48. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Cailliet R, Haas JW. Do alterations in vertebral and disc dimensions affect an elliptical model of the thoracic kyphosis? Spine 2003;28(5):463-469
49. Troyanovich SJ, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Harrison DE. Radiographic mensuration characteristics of the sagittal lumbar spine from a normal population with a method to synthesize prior studies of lordosis. J Spinal Disord 1997;10(5):380-386
50. Janik TJ, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE. Can the sagittal lumbar curvature be closely approximated by an ellipse? J Orthop Res 1998;16(6):766-770
51. Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Harrison DE, Holland B. Elliptical modeling of the sagittal lumbar lordosis and segmental rotation angles as a method to discriminate between normal and low back pain subjects. J Spinal Disord 1998;11(5):430-439
52. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Cobb method or Harrison posterior tangent method: which to choose for lateral cervical radiographic analysis. Spine 2000;25(16):2072-2078
53. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. Centroid, Cobb or Harrison posterior tangents: which to choose for analysis of thoracic kyphosis? Spine 2001;26(11): E227-E234
54. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. Radiographic analysis of lumbar lordosis: Cobb method, centroidal method, TRALL or Harrison posterior tangents? Spine 2001;26(11):E235-E242
55. Harrison DE, Holland B, Harrison DD, Janik TJ. Further reliability analysis of the Harrison radiographic line drawing methods: Crossed ICCs for lateral posterior tangents and AP Modified-Riser Ferguson. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2002;25:93-98
56. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Colloca CJ, et al. Repeatability over time of posture, radiograph positioning, and radiograph line drawing: An analysis of six control groups. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26:87-98
57. McAviney J, Schulz D, Bock R, Harrison DE, Holland B. Determining the relationship between cervical lordosis and neck complaints. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2005;28(3):187-93
58. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Janik TJ, Holland B. Changes in sagittal lumbar configuration with a new method of extension traction: non-randomized clinical control trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2002;83(11):1585-1591
59. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Holland B. New 3-Point bending traction method of restoring cervical lordosis combined with cervical manipulation: non-randomized clinical control trial. Arch Phys Med Rehab 2002;83(4):447-453
60. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Betz J, Colloca CJ, Janik TJ, Holland B. Increasing the cervical lordosis with seated combined extension-compression and transverse load cervical traction with cervical manipulation: non-randomized clinical control trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2003;26(3):139-151
61. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Haas JW, Betz JW, Janik TJ, Holland B. Conservative methods to correct lateral translations of the head: a non-randomized clinical control trial. J Rehab Res Devel 2004;41(4):631-640
62. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Betz JW, Harrison DD, Haas JW, Janik TJ, Holland B. Harrison mirror image methods for correcting trunk list: a non-randomized clinical control trial. Eur Spine J 2005;14(2):155-162
63. Moustafa IM, Diab AM, Ahmed A, Harrison DE. The efficacy of cervical lordosis rehabilitation for nerve root function, pain, and segmental motion in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. PhysioTher 2011;97 Supplement:846-847
64. Diab AA, Moustafa IM. Rehabilitation for pain and lumbar segmental motion in chronic mechanical low back pain: a randomized trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2012;35(4):246-253
65. Moustafa IM, Diab AA. Extension traction treatment for patients with discogenic lumbosacral radiculopathy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil 2012;27(1):51-62
66. Diab AA, Moustafa IM. The efficacy of lumbar extension traction for sagittal alignment in mechanical low back pain. a randomized trial. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2013;26(2):213-222
67. Moustafa IM, Diab AA, Harrison DE. Does improvement towards a normal cervical sagittal configuration aid in the management of lumbosacral radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial Proceedings of the 13th World Federation of Chiropractic Biennial Congress / ECU Convention, Athens, Greece, May 13-16, 2015. Paper #184 Mediterranean Region Award Winning Paper
68. Moustafa IM, Diab AA, Taha S, Harrison DE. Addition of a sagittal cervical posture corrective orthotic device to a multimodal rehabilitation program improves short- and long-term outcomes in patients with discogenic cervical radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2016;97:2034-2044
69. Moustafa IM, Diab AA, Harrison DE: The effect of normalizing the sagittal cervical configuration on dizziness, neck pain, and cervicocephalic kinesthetic sensibility: a 1-year randomized controlled study. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2017;53:57-71
70. Moustafa IM, Diab AAM, Hegazy FA, Harrison DE. Does rehabilitation of cervical lordosis influence sagittal cervical spine flexion extension kinematics in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy subjects? J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2017;30:937-941
71. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Troyanovich SJ. Three-dimensional spinal coupling mechanics: Part II. Implications for chiropractic theories and practice. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1998;21(3):177-186
72. Vrtovec T, Janssen MM, Likar B, Castelein RM, Viergever MA, Pernuš F. Evaluation of pelvic morphology in the sagittal plane. Spine J. 2013 Nov;13(11):1500-1509.
73. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kwack YH, Son ES. The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2011;25(2):E41–47.
74. Ordway NR, Seymour R, Donelson RG, Hojnowski L, Lee E, Edwards WT. Cervical sagittal range-of-motion analysis using three methods. Cervical range-of-motion device, 3space, and radiography. Spine 1997;22(5):501-508
75. Azegami H, Murachi S, Kitoh J, Ishida Y, Kawakami N, Makino M. Etiology of idiopathic scoliosis. Computational study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;(357):229-236
76. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ, Troyanovich SJ, Coleman RR. Lumbar coupling during lateral translations of the thoracic cage relative to a fixed pelvis. Clin Biomech 1999;14(10):704-709
77. Harrison DE, Harrison DD, Cailliet R, Troyanovich SJ, Janik TJ. Cervical coupling during lateral head translations creates an “S”-configuration. Clin Biomech 2000;15:436-440
78. Harrison DE, Cailliet R, Harrison DD, Janik TJ. How do anterior/posterior translations of the thoracic cage affect the sagittal lumbar spine, pelvic tilt, and thoracic kyphosis? Euro Spine J 2002;11(3):287-293
79. Yoganandan N, Pintar FA, Arnold P, Reinartz J, Cusick JF, Maiman DJ, Sances A. Continuous motion analysis of the head-neck complex under impact. J Spinal Disorders 1994;7:420-428

80. Oktenglu T, Ozer F, Ferrara LA, Andalkar N, Sarioglu AC, Benzel EC. J Neurosurg (Spine 1) 2001;94:108-114

81. Nightingale RW, Camacho DL, Armstrong, Robinette JJ, Myers BS. Inertial properties and loading rates affect buckling modes and injury mechanisms in the cervical
spine. J Biomechanics 2000;33:191-197

82. Nightingale RW, McElhaney JH, Richardson WJ, Myers BS. Dynamic responses of the head and cervical spine axial impact loading. J Biomechanics 1996;29:307-318

83. Nightingale RW, McElhaney JH, Richardson WJ, Best TM, Myers BS. Experimental impact injury to the cervical spine: Relating motion of the head and the mechanism of injury. J Bone Joint Sur AM 1996;78-A:412-421

84. Fukushima M, Kaneoka K, Ono K, Sakane M, Ujihashi S, Ochiai N. Neck injury mechanisms during direct face impact. Spine 2006;31:903-908

85. Garcia T, Ravani B. A biomechanical evaluation of whiplash using a multi-body dynamic model. Transactions of ASME. 2003;125:254-265

86. Panjabi MM, Pearson AM, Ito S, Ivancic PC, Wang JL. Cervical spine curvature during simulated whiplash. Clin Biomechanics 2004;19:1-9

87. Stemper BD, Yoganandan N, Pintar FA. Effect of head restraint backset on head-neck kinematics in whiplash. Accident Analysis Prevention 2006;38:317-323

88. Matsunaga, S, Sakou T, Sunahara N, Oonishi T, Maeda S, Nakanisi K. Biomechanical analysis of buckling alignment of the cervical spine. Spine 1997;22:765-771

89. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Nagayama T, Nakanisi K. A new biomechanical analysis of the degenerative lumbar spine. In: Takahashi HE, editor. Spinal disorders in growth and ageing. Tokyo:Springer-Verlag,1995:175-182

90. Matsunaga S, Sakou T, Taketomi I, Ijiri K. Comparisons of operative results of lumbar disc herniations in manual laborers and athletes. Spine 1993;18:2222-2226

91. Goel VK, Weinstein JN, Patwardhan AG. Biomechanics of intact ligamentous spine. In: Goel VK, Weinstein JN, editors. Biomechanics of the Spine: Clinical and surgical Perspective. Boca Raton: CRC Press;1990:135

92. Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM. Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part 1: theory. Clin Biomech 1992;7:19-26

93. Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Yamamoto I, Oxland TR. Euler stability of the human ligamentous lumbar spine. Part II: experiment. Clin Biomech 1992;7:27-32

94. Weiler PJ, Buckling analysis of spinal implant devices used for the surgical treatment of scoliosis. MASc Thesis, Department of Civil Engineering. Ontario (Canada): University of Waterloo, 1983
95. Pope MH, Panjabi MM. Biomechanical definitions of spinal instability. Spine 1985;10:255-266
96. Farfan HF. The pathological anatomy of degenerative spondylolisthesis. Spine 1980;5:412-418

97. Paris SV. Physical signs of instability. Spine 1985;10:277-279.

98. Panjabi MM, Abumi K, Duranceau J, Oxland T. Spinal stability and intersegmental muscle forces, a biomechanical mode l. Spine 1989;14:194-199

99. Dupuis PR, Cassidy JD, Kirkaldy-Willis WH. Radiological diagnosis of degenerative lumbar spinal instability. Spine 1985;10:262-276

100. Friberg O. Lumbar instability: a dynamic approach by traction-compression radiography. Spine 1987;12:117-129

101. Dvorak J, Panjabi MM, Gerber M, Wichmann W. CT-Functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of the upper cervical spine. Part 1: an experimental study on healthy cadavers. Spine 1987;12:197-205

102. Dvorak J, Hayek J, Zehnder R. CT-functional diagnostics of the rotatory instability of the upper cervical spine. Part 2: an evaluation on healthy adults and patients with suspected instability. Spine 1987;12:726-731

103. Fazl M, LaFebvre J, Willinsky RA et al. Posttraumatic ligamentous disruption of the cervical spine, an easily overlooked diagnosis: presentation of three cases. Neurosurgery 1990;26:674-678

104. Triano J. The theoretical basis for spinal manipulation. Chapter 19. In: Haldeman S., editor, Modern Developments in Chiropractic, 3rd edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2005:361-381

105. Cholewicki J, McGill SM. Lumbar posterior ligament involvement during extremely heavy lifts estimated from fluoroscopic measurements. J Biomech 1992;25:17-28

106. McGill SM. The biomechanics of low back injury: Implications on current practice in industry and the clinic. J Biomech 1997;30:465-475

107. Owens EF, Eriksen K. Upper cervical post x-ray reduction and its relationship to symptomatic improvement and spinal stability. Chiro Res J 1997(4:2):10-17
108. Khorshid KA, Sweat RW, Zemba Jr. DA, Zemba BN. Clinical efficacy of upper cervical versus full spine chiropractic care on children with autism: A randomized clinical trial. J Vert Sublux Res 2006: 1-7
109. Lechner R, Putzer D, Dammerer D, Liebensteiner M, Bach C, Thaler M. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional measurement of the Cobb angle in scoliosis. Int Orthop 2017 May;41(5):957-962
110. Chen JH, Liu C, You L, Simmons CA. Boning up on Wolff's Law: mechanical regulation of the cells that make and maintain bone. J Biomech 2010;43(1):108-118
111. Frost HM: Wolff's Law and bone's structural adaptations to mechanical usage: an overview for clinicians. Angle Orthod 1994;64:175-188
112. Frost HM: A 2003 update of bone physiology and Wolff's Law for clinicians. Angle Orthod 2004;74:3-15
113. Schreiber LF, Weinerman HW. Davis' and Wolff's laws in the light of modern science. J Am Podiatry Assoc 1965;55(12):808-813
114. Henenfeld M. The application of Davis' Law. J Natl Assoc Chirop 1953;43(5):23-28
115. Lawrence D. Forward. In: Rosner AL. The role of subluxation in chiropractic. Des Moines (IA): Foundation for Chiropractic Education and Research; 1997