ASSESSING CONDITIONS SEEN AND SERVICES PROVIDED BY VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION CHIROPRACTORS: COMPARING PROVIDER SELF-REPORT WITH ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD DATA

Main Article Content

Brent Young
Anthony Lisi
Stephanie Halloran
Kelsey Corcoran

Keywords

Veterans Health Administration, Utilization

Abstract

Objective: To compare Veterans Health Administration (VHA) chiropractors’ self-report of the most common conditions seen and services provided with electronic health record (EHR) data from VHA chiropractic visits.


Methods: A cross-sectional analysis of VHA administrative data from fiscal year 2019 (October 1, 2018 through September 30, 2019) was conducted to assess the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) and Current Procedural Terminology® (CPT®) codes of all on-station chiropractic visits. The 100 most common ICD-10 and CPT® code were organized into categories and the proportion of codes in each category was calculated for both diagnoses and procedure. Additionally, a secondary analysis of data from a previous VHA chiropractor survey was conducted to calculate relative frequencies of provider-reported conditions managed and services provided.


Results: Low back pain without radiculopathy (LBPwo) was the most frequent ICD-10 code in administrative data (47.7%) and was also rated the most common condition seen by provider self-report (3.75/4 relative frequency). The frequency of ICD-10 codes for neck pain without radiculopathy (NPwo, 19.99%) was less than half of that for LBPwo, yet DCs’ self-reported NPwo relative frequency (3.66/4) was essentially the same as LBPwo. Even greater disparity existed between the very low frequencies of ICD-10 codes for headache and extremity conditions, and the relatively higher rates at which DCs report seeing these conditions. The most frequent CPT® code grouping in administrative data was chiropractic manipulative therapy (CMT), representing 42.7% of all CPT® codes. This was concordant with chiropractor self-report, which placed CMT at the highest relative frequency rating of 3.86/4. Chiropractors reported providing therapeutic exercise, self-management, and patient education at high frequencies, yet CPT® codes for these therapies were rare.


Conclusion: There is some agreement and much discrepancy between VHA chiropractors’ report of practice characteristics and VHA EHR data. Additional work is needed to better understand the extent of documentation agreement, and its impact on patient and system outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
Abstract 119 | VHA CHIROPRACTORS Downloads 55

References

1. Prater L, Sanchez A, Modan G, et al. Electronic health record documentation patterns of recorded primary care visits focused on complex communication: A qualitative study. Appl Clin Inform 2019;10(2):247–253
2. Napier R, Bruelheide LS, Haug RH. Insurance billing and code. Dental Clin North Am 2008;52(3)
3. Kimble C. Electronic health records: cure-all or chronic condition? Glob Bus Organ Excel 2014;33(4):63–74.
4. Chan KS, Fowles JB, Weiner JP. Electronic health records and the reliability and validity of quality measure: A review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev 2010 Oct;67(5):503-27
5. Abel EA, Brandt CA, Czlapinski R, Goulet JL. Pain research using veterans health administration electronic and administrative data sources. J Rehabil Res Dev 2016;53(1):1-12
6. Lisi AJ, Brandt CA. Trends in the use and characteristics of chiropractic services in the department of veterans affairs. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2016;39:381-386
7. Beliveau PJH, Wong JJ, Sutton DA et al. The chiropractic profession: a scoping review of utilization rates, reasons for seeking care, patient profiles, and care provided. Chiropr Man Therap 2017;25:35. doi: 10.1186/s12998-017-0165-8
8. Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Carey TS, Weinberger M. Documentation of pain care processes does not accurately reflect pain management delivered in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 2010;25(3):194-199
9. Modes ME, Engelberg RA, Downey L, Nielsen EL, Curtis JR, Kross EK. Did a goals-of-care discussion happen? Differences in the occurrence of goals-of-care discussions as reported by patients, clinicians, and in the electronic health record. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019;57(2):251-259
10. Walraven CB, Forster A. Administrative database research infrequently used validated diagnostic or procedural codes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(10):1054-1059
11. DesHarnais S, Carter RE, Hennessy W, Kurent JE, Carter C. Lack of concordance between physician and patient: reports on end-of-life care discussions. J Palliat Med 2007;10(3):728-740
12. Sanders JJ, Curtis JR, Tulsky JA. Achieving goal-concordant care: a conceptual model and approach to measuring serious illness communication and its impact. J Palliat Med 2018;21(S2):S17-27
13. Weiner JP, Fowles JB, Chan KS. New paradigms for measuring clinical performance using electronic health records. Int J Qual Health Care 2012;24(3):200-205