Main Article Content
Soft Tissue; Rehabilitation; Physical Therapy
Background: Instrument-Assisted Soft-Tissue Mobilization (IASTM) is a common form of manual therapy involving rigid instruments of various shapes and materials to locate and treat soft tissue disorders. The therapeutic mechanism of IASTM is not clearly understood, but there is some evidence that the technique may support the breakdown and absorption of scar tissue, mobilization of fascia, and improved tissue healing. Currently, there are no systematic reviews that have specifically investigated the effects of IASTM on pain intensity of soft tissue disorders.
Objective: The purpose of this study was to systematically appraise the current evidence assessing the effects of IASTM on pain intensity in the treatment of musculoskeletal conditions.
Methods: A search of the literature was conducted during the Fall of 2017 which included the following electronic databases: PubMed, CINAHL, MEDLINE, PEDro, and SPORTDiscus. The search terms included individual or a combination of the following: instrument; assisted; augmented; soft-tissue; mobilization; Graston; and technique.
Results: A total of 5 randomized controlled trials and 1 controlled clinical trial were included. The Graston technique was reported as being the specific technique utilized in all studies. Five of the 6 studies compared IASTM to a non-IASTM group. All 5 of these studies demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant (p<0.05) reduction in pain within the IASTM groups. Four of the 6 studies demonstrated a statistically significant (p<0.05) difference between groups.
Conclusion: The literature surrounding the efficacy of IASTM for musculoskeletal pain is evolving. Due to the paucity and heterogeneity of studies included, in addition to a lack of methodological consistency, it is difficult to make clinical recommendations with respect to optimal IASTM protocols. However, the results of this review indicate that most included studies of IASTM appears to demonstrate clinically meaningful change with respect to pain intensity for musculoskeletal conditions.
2. DeLuccio J. Instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization utilizing graston technique: a physical therapist’s perspective. Orthop Pract 2006;18:31–34
3. Stow R. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization. Int J Athl Ther Train 2011;16(3): 5–8
4. Nielsen A. Gua Sha: a traditional technique for modern practice. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2000
5. Laudner K, Compton BD, McLoda TA, Walters C. Acute effects of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization for improving posterior shoulder range of motion in collegiate baseball players. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2014;9(1):1–7
6. Carey-Loghmani MT. Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization. In: 2nd, ed. Conservative management of sports injuries: Jones and Bartlett; 2007
7. Howitt S, Jung S, Hammonds N. Conservative treatment of a tibialis posterior strain in a novice triathlete: a case report. J Canadian Chiropr Assoc 2009;53(1):23-31
8. Loghmani MT, Warden SJ. Instrument-assisted cross fiber massage increases tissue perfusion and alters microvascular morphology in the vicinity of healing knee ligaments. BMC Complem Alternat Med 2013;13:240
9. Loghmani MT, Warden SJ. Instrument-assisted cross-fiber massage accelerates knee ligament healing. J Orth Sports Phys Ther 2009;39(7):506-513
10. Lee JH, Lee DK, Oh JS. The effect of Graston technique on the pain and range of motion in patients with chronic low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2016;28: 1852-1855
11. Lee JJ, Lee JH, Kim DH, You SJ. Inhibitory effects of instrument-assisted neuromobilization on hyperactive gastrocnemius in a hemiparetic stroke patient. Biomed Mater Eng 2014;24(6): 2389-2394
12. Ge W, Khalsa PS. Encoding of compressive stress during indentation by group III and IV muscle mechano-nociceptors in rat gracilis muscle. J Neurophysiol 2003;89: 785–792
13. Howitt S, Wong J, Zabukovec S. The conservative treatment of trigger thumb using Graston techniques and active release techniques. J Canadian Chiropr Assoc 2006;50:249–254
14. Stecco C, Day JA. The fascial manipulation technique and its biomechanical model: a guide to the human fascial system. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork 2010;3(1):38-40
15. Stecco C, Schleip R. A fascia and the fascial system. J Bodywork Move Ther 2016;20(1):139-140
16. Cheatham SW, Lee M, Cain M, Baker R. The efficacy of instrument assisted soft tissue mobilization: a systematic review. J Canadian Chiropr Assoc 2016;60(3): 200-209
17. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman D. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 2009;151(4):264-269
18. Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration. Br Med J 2009;339:b2700
19. Kivlan BR, Carcia CR, Clemente FR, Phelps AL, Martin RL. The effect of Astym(R) Therapy on muscle strength: a blinded, randomized, clinically controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2015;16:325
20. Nielsen A. Gua sha research and the language of integrative medicine. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2009;13(1):63-72
21. Olsen MF, Bjerre E, Hansen MD, et al. Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain. BMC Med 2017;15(1):35
22. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 2003;83(8):713-721
23. Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. There was evidence of convergent and construct validity of Physiotherapy Evidence Database quality scale for physiotherapy trials. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63(8):920-925
24. Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Bureau Y, Speechley MR. Estimates of quality and reliability with the Physiotherapy Evidence Based Database Scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. Phys Ther 2006;86(6):817-824
25. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37(5):360-363
26. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174
27. Blanchette MA, Normand MC. Augmented soft tissue mobilization vs natural history in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis: a pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2011;34(2):123-130
28. Brantingham JW, Globe GA, Jensen ML et al. A feasibility study comparing two chiropractic protocols in the treatment of patellofemoral pain syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2009;32(7):536-548
29. Burke J, Buchberger DJ, Carey-Loghmani MT, Dougherty PE, Greco DS, Dishman JD. A pilot study comparing two manual therapy interventions for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2007;30(1):50-61
30. Crothers A, French S, Hebert J, Walker B. Spinal manipulative therapy, Graston technique and placebo for non-specific thoracic spine pain: a randomised controlled trial. Chiropr Man Ther 2016;24(16):1-9
31. Schaefer J, Sandrey M. Effects of a 4-week dynamic-balance-training program
supplemented with Graston instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization for chronic ankle instability. J Sport Rehabil 2012; 21:313-326
32. Moon JH, Jung JH, Won YS, Cho HY. Immediate effects of Graston technique on hamstring muscle extensibility and pain intensity in patients with nonspecific low back pain. J Phys Ther Sci 2017;29(2):224-227
33. Moseley AM, Elkins MR, Janer-Duncan L, Hush JM. The quality of reports of randomized controlled trials varies between subdisciplines of physiotherapy. Physiother Can 2014;66(1):36-43
34. Sherrington C, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Elkins MR, Maher CG. Ten years of evidence to guide physiotherapy interventions: Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). Br J Sports Med 2010;44(12):836-837