Main Article Content
Heart Rate Varaiability, Spinal Manipulation
Introduction: Timing of a health care intervention is often a key factor in the success of a clinical procedure. This case study of a chiropractic practice analyzes heart rate variability (HRV) as a method of determining optimal timing for spinal adjustment.
Methods: Thirty-eight patients’ HRV findings were analyzed retrospectively to determine if an optimal HRV value was associated with greater (improved) HRV responses following their spinal adjustment. The HRV measure considered in this study was the time domain metric of root mean square of the successive differences between heart beats (rMSSD). The terms rMSSD and HRV are used interchangeably in this paper. Post-pre HRV change was the dependent variable and compared between low versus high pre-adjustment HRV. A 2- ailed p-value of 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Patients whose pre-adjustment HRV values were 25.5 milliseconds (ms) or lower tended to show better (larger) HRV changes compared to patients having HRV values of 28.0 ms or higher (p = 0.0026, effect size = 2.0).
Conclusions: In this case study, patients who had rMSSD values of 28.0 ms or higher may not have needed a spinal adjustment according to HRV, evidenced by their worsened post-adjustment HRV values. Further study in other chiropractic practices is a reasonable next step.
2. Hart J. Analysis and adjustment of vertebral subluxation as a separate and distinct identity for the chiropractic profession: A commentary. J Chiropr Humanities 2016; 3(1):46-52
3. Palmer BJ. Chiropractic clinical controlled research. Hammond, IN; W.B. Conkey, 1951.
4. Hart J, Omolo B, Boone WR, Brown C, Ashton A. Reliability of three methods of computer-aided thermal pattern analysis. J Canadian Chiropr Assoc 2007; 51:175-185
5. Usman Z, et al. Relation of high heart rate variability to healthy longevity. Am J Cardiol 2010;105(8):181-1185
6. Urbanik D, Podgórski M, Mazur G. Heart rate variability – clinical significance. Family Med Primary Care Rev 2018;20(1):87–90
7. Zhang J, Dean D, Nosco D, Strathopulos D, Floros M. Effect of chiropractic care on heart rate variability and pain in a multisite clinical study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2006;29:267-274
8. Welch A, Boone R. Sympathetic and parasympathetic responses to specific diversified adjustments to chiropractic vertebral subluxations of the cervical and thoracic spine. J Chiropr Med 2008;7:86–93
9. Baek HJ, Cho CH, Cho J, Woo JM. Reliability of ultra-short-term analysis as a surrogate of standard 5-min analysis of heart rate variability. Telemedicine 2015;21(5):404-414
10. Kim GM, Woo JM. Determinants for heart rate variability in a normal Korean population. J Korean Med Sci 2011;26:1293-1298
11. Altini M. Heart rate variability Logger – app details. December 12, 2013. Accessed 1-1-19 at: https://www.marcoaltini.com/blog/heart-rate-variability-logger-app-details
12. Plews DJ, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding AE, Laursen PB. Comparison of heart rate variability recording with smart phone photoplethysmographic Polar H7 chest strap and electrocardiogram methods. Int J Sports Physiol Performance 2017;12:1-17
13. Vescio B, Salsone M, Gambardella A, Quattrone A. Comparison between electrocardiographic and earlobe pulse photoplethysmographic detection for evaluating heart rate variability in healthy subjects in short- and long-term recordings. Sensors 2018;18:844.
14. Palmer College of Chiropractic. Philosophy Statement. Retrieved 1-1-19 from: http://www.palmer.edu/about-us/identity/#Practice_Paradigm
15. McMains V. Johns Hopkins study suggests medical errors are third-leading cause of death in U.S. The Hub. May 3, 2016. Available at: https://hub.jhu.edu/2016/05/03/medical-errors-third-leading-cause-of-death/
16. Dubos R. Mirage of health. New Brunswick, NJ; Rutgers University Press. 1987:203-204
17. Yu Y, Xu Y, Zhang M, Wang Y, Zou W, Gu Y. Value of assessing autonomic nervous function by heart rate variability and heart rate turbulence in hypertensive patients. Int J Hypertension 2018. Article ID 4067601. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/4067601
18. Winter J. Using the student’s t-test with extremely small samples. Practical Assessment, Research Evaluation 2013; 8(10):1-12